The Connection Between Muslim Inbreeding and Terrorism

The Connection Between Muslim Inbreeding and Terrorism

10News 22 Comments on The Connection Between Muslim Inbreeding and Terrorism

The connection between Muslim inbreeding and terrorism

by Nicolai Sennels

If there are two things that characterize Islamic culture, they are terrorism and inbreeding. The latest research shows that these two things might be closely connected.

The concept of Islamic terror does not need any introduction. Not everyone might know, however, that seventy percent of Pakistanis and forty percent of Turks are inbred (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 “More stillbirths among immigrants”). Research shows that the same goes for close to half of all Arabs (Reproductive Health Journal, 2009 “Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs”).

First cousin marriages have been the tradition in many Muslim families for innumerable generations. Such marriages increase the risk of negative mental and physical consequences. My article “Muslim inbreeding: Impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society” details extensive research data on the subject. In brief, inbreeding through consanguineous marriages increases the risk of depression (Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2009 “Relationship between consanguinity and depression in a south Indian population”) and schizophrenia (American Psychiatric Press, 1982 “The role of genetic factors in the etiology of the schizophrenic disorders”).

The risk of serious illnesses or handicaps increases by up to 1800 percent (BMJ, 1994“Infant death and consanguineous marriage”). Risk of mental retardation increases with 400 percent (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 “Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation”). Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from blood related parents and that abilities related to social behavior and empathy develops slower in inbred babies (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 “Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children” [pdf]). Such facts might make several pieces fall into place for many people.

Here comes another eye opener:

Research published in The Journal of Aggression and Violent Behaviour has proven a connection between suicide bombers and depression and physical handicaps (BT, December 15th 2010 “Why most terrorists are useless”). Research suggests that many suicide bombers are suffering from depression, and their actions are just a socially accepted (among Muslims) way of committing suicide in order to end their mental torment.

Yusuf Yadgari of the Medical University of Kabul has autopsied the remains of suicide bombers and his findings support this theory. Yadgari found that close to ninety percent were suffering from severe illness such as blindness, cancer, missing limbs or leprosy. Many Muslim societies, including that of Afghanistan, have a low social acceptance of handicaps and severe illnesses. According to Yadgari, being physically handicapped or mentally retarded often leads to exclusion in a society like Afghanistan, and becoming a martyr might be the only chance of achieving social recognition and honour — if not just a way to end the pain of being socially isolated (which is especially traumatizing in collectivist cultures like Islam). Al Qaida’s use of people with Down’s syndrome might be another unpleasant side effect of the many chromosomal illnesses resulting from inbreeding between first cousins. People with low intelligence (because of inbreeding) might also be easier to brainwash with fundamentalist Islam.

Surely the Quran’s numerous verses ordering Muslims to fight to the death in order to spread sharia and defend the honour of their religion and prophet is the most obvious and strongest motivator for Islamic terrorism. Being an outcast due to a physical handicap, living in a country that does not manage to take care of handicapped people, suffering from physical pain following disease, or being depressed or schizophrenic, has now proved to be an important factor as well.

The unhealthy culture of inbreeding in Muslim societies increases the number of Muslim martyrs who are looking for an honourable and socially and religiously accepted way out of here.

Share this:

Related Articles

22 Comments

  1. Shaniqua mohamed August 21, 2015 at

    infidels are inbread!

    • Mz Bonnie August 22, 2015 at

      inbread? Haha… you realize you didn’t even read the article or you’d see your obvious misunderstanding of what it meant and your misspelling reflects that. Which illustrates the point of this article. INBREEDING makes for birth defects, retardation, schizophrenia and a lot of nasty recessive genes. Pretty funny that you, yourself, prove the point. Is daddy a relative of mommy? Marrying close relatives is not a part of the civilized world.

      • Yoko September 4, 2015 at

        Yes he proof, indeed he might have some goat genes too.

    • kenzo August 26, 2015 at

      You are inbred ignorant goatfucker.

    • Michael August 26, 2015 at

      “Inbred”. Learn to spell !

    • Michael August 26, 2015 at

      “Inbred”. Learn to spell

    • john August 26, 2015 at

      Bullshit! Caucasian consanguinity is very low, almost zero.

    • Don Briscoe August 30, 2015 at

      That figures only mentally messed up retards could possibly believe in this evil cult, is this why these “people” fuk goats and donkeys and small children? Is it why they cover their wives from head to toe so they can imagine they are fuking a man or a goat ? Sick perverts all of them.

  2. kenzo August 26, 2015 at

    Muslims are terrorist scum.

  3. Kalif and proud not to be daesh August 26, 2015 at

    Quote of the year :
    >>>>>>>>
    Shaniqua mohamed
    August 21, 2015 at
    “”infidels are inbread!””

    >>>>>>>>
    Very well written article. Obviously there is a major problem.

  4. david wilkinson August 26, 2015 at

    The founder of your backward cult was an evil paedo himself inbred.He would be given life if he were here now.

  5. ALLAH August 27, 2015 at

    FUNNY FACT:

    When a towelhead/ moissy dose us a favor and blows himself up he thinks he’s going to heaven to fuck 72 virgins.

    What I know after researching these terrorise dogs is that ONLY THE MUSLIM MEN, Go to heaven.

    SO AS MY THEORY. MUSLIM MEN ARE PUTRID PILLOWBITEING FAGGOTS. JUST LIKE THERE ALLAH.

    I ALSO HEARD ALLAH INTRODUCED BEASTIALITY(WITH PIGS) ONCE HIS MOTHER KILLED HERSELF DUE TO ALLAH RAPEING HER

    ALL IN ALL YOU PUTRID MUSLIM DOGS SHOULD ALL DIE IN A HOLE.

    TOU RAPIST TERRORIST SWINE!!!

  6. Iftikhar Ahmad August 30, 2015 at

    White people shooting down other white people is a “skirmish”. Black people peacefully marching 30 days and rioting on one is called a murderous mob of thugs Where are all the white on white crime whiners?…”crickets” America…devolving to the wild west/mad maxistan… preventable? Yes, when the cancer of (every-man-for-himself, extreme individualistic selfishness, my-rights-or-a-bullet-at-you) is cured.

    Who says that America is not a terrorist state? America is terrorising the whole world while American citizens are victim of terrorism by their own people.

    Terrorism, the use of violence against civilians is not new and it is not unique to Islamic extremists. Though we are hyper-aware of this threat from groups that view themselves as the only true Muslims, let us not forget that assaults on civilians have been used widely throughout human existence and was a widespread occurrence in the last century. Dresden, The Holocaust, Biafra, Rwanda, Cambodia, Oklahoma City… None of these had anything to do with Islam. The problem is not that Islam harbours fanatics, that Europeans allow Muslim immigrants to dwell in impoverished ghettos, or that the Western Nations support despots to ensure access to the oil of the Middle East, though all are true. The problem is that people, and states, are all too willing to use violence to advance their own self-interest. Until we eschew violence, it will always be a weapon easily adopted by the least among us to strike at the privileged.

    Charlie Hebdo is a disgusting, racist and bigoted satirical publication that has been inviting such a tragedy for many years. What is the point of humour at the expense of others beliefs? The reason we’re not allowed to depict our Prophet graphically is through his own instruction. He did not want to be “idolized” in any way. He even said himself “I am just a man”. These terrorists have done the exact opposite – they have idolized him by claiming a false “vengeance”. Still, I despise Charlie Hebdo. They were asking for it knowing full well the state of extremism in the world today. Islamic terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, it has to do with societal problems. That makes sense. That is why we see so many non-Muslim, poor Latin Americans, Africans and Indians resorting to terrorism as a means to vent their anger, right?

    In Islam there is no commandment to kill people by making such allegations against them. The cartoonists had exercised their freedom of expression, and freedom of expression is totally allowed in Islam. Even during the Prophet’s time there were several instances of ridicule, however the Prophet and his Companions neither punished such persons nor asked anyone to do so. On every occasion of this kind, the Prophet’s Companions always tried to positively disseminate the message of Islam. They never tried to punish these people. The killing of those people who had published the cartoons is a gravely un-Islamic act in the name of Islam.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

    • Chris Birkbeck September 30, 2015 at

      Iftikhar Ahmad: Why is it with every Muslim I have ever spoken to, (quite a number), all without exception have given an exactly opposite take to you? I do know that other Muslims have stated to me categorically that their mission in life is to deceive people of other religions and atheists to make them think that they are safe from Islam. That way their agenda can be realised of taking over and killing these non believers. I guess you went to a different mosque?

    • David October 21, 2015 at

      “Charlie Hebdo is a disgusting, racist and bigoted satirical publication that has been inviting such a tragedy for many years. What is the point of humour at the expense of others beliefs? The reason we’re not allowed to depict our Prophet graphically is through his own instruction. ”

      Thanks for revealing ur antidemocratic and bigoted position. Not a cartoon drawer (who made cartoons about EVERYTHING which actually is the opposite of bigoted and racist behaviour) is disgusting but persons like you who show not the slightest bit of self-reflection if members of ur “club” killed other people, even implying that it’s the fault of the victims. THIS is disgusting. It’s the same grotesque “logic” as claiming that rape is the fault of the rape victim for wearing unproper clothing.

      You are an enemy of reason, humanity, empathy and democracy. Please leave the civilized world and settle in the arabian desert were you belong. There you have plenty of room to play with ur little toys “Mohammed” and “Quran”. There you can happily stone each other, hack off hands and heads and lie to each other how great this all is and what a superior society you have in contrast to the bad West.

      “Even during the Prophet’s time there were several instances of ridicule, however the Prophet and his Companions neither punished such persons nor asked anyone to do so. On every occasion of this kind, the Prophet’s Companions always tried to positively disseminate the message of Islam. ”

      Why do you lie? You clearly admitted that you are not allowed to depitct your “Prophet” with the above statement.

      “The cartoonists had exercised their freedom of expression, and freedom of expression is totally allowed in Islam.”

      Excellent. Then let me take the opportunity to call Mohammed an inhumane and sadistic asshole, a pedophile child molester, a dishonest sect guru, an opportunistic liar and power-hungry warlord. This guy, if he ever lived, not much historical evidence anyway, was a really bad person and his ideas are so grotesque that one could only wonder how on earth a person of the 21st century can fall for this bullshit.

      “None of these had anything to do with Islam.”

      You my friend are the best example of why this claim is wrong.

    • Ali tabrizi June 20, 2016 at

      Iftikhar Ahmed, apparently you haven’t read the Quran or studied Mohammed historians like Tabari, Ibn-Khaldoon, Sahih Bukhari and numerous others. Mohammad beheaded 800 members of Bani-Quraizah Jewish tribe in one day. Tabari writes: “a small creek of blood was flowing beneath his feet from beheading. Infant children were pierced by spears and left on spears and planted on soil for all to see”.
      He advanced his “religion” by terror and Moslems are doing the same thing today.

  7. Iftikhar Ahmad August 30, 2015 at

    Muhammad (PBUH)

    I had a privilege to reflect in the House of Commons about the glorious personality of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) on 18th March, 2015. The session was initiated and chaired by Rt. Honourable Member Parliament (MP) Gavin Shuker. Although the session held at House of Commons but it was also attended by various members of House of Lords. It was a pleasant surprise to see that legendary Parliamentarian Rt. Honourable MP George Galloway was one of my co-speaker in the session. My speech was as follows:

    Rt Honourable MPs, Lords, ladies and gentlemen, good evening. Let me first of all thank Rt. Honourable MP Gavin Shuker to initiate and requisite this session to reflect about the glorious personality of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The personality of Muhammad (PBUH) is significant not only for the reason that he is followed by 2,786,635 people in UK, about 44,138,000 in European Union and approximately 1.6 billion people across the world. His significance really lies in his teachings which are based on peace, forbearance, tolerance, co-existence and community cohesion—the themes which are so relevant and significant to our British Society and modern world today.

    Few of the honourable speakers have already highlighted the need of interfaith harmony and community cohesion. I would like to inform you that Muhammad (PBUH) laid the strong foundations of interfaith relations and community cohesion by signing the Charter of Madina in 622 AD with the Jewish and Christian tribes of Madina. He declared that Muslim, Christian and Jews were “one community”, and this Charter formed the basis of a multi-religious and Islamic state in Madina. The Islamic state of Madina under Muhammad (PBUH) issued a Covenant in 626 AD to the Christian monks of Saint Catherine’s Monastery. The convent had a hand imprint of Muhammad (PBUH). The convent even today is a great foundation for peace and harmony between Muslims and Christians. It encourages Muslims to rise above communal prejudice and engenders good will in Christians.

    Honourable MPs…. you and your fellow parliamentarians needs to be congratulated to bring together over 116 separate pieces of legislation into one single Act. The Equality Act 2010 which simplifies, strengthens and harmonises the current legislation to provide Britain with a new discrimination law which protects individuals from unfair treatment and promotes a fair and more equal society. But it is also true that in our modern Britain we still observe terms i.e – ‘black’, ‘coloured’ and ‘ethnic’ that have all meant or implied different things at different times, and continue to give rise to argument about their usage. We also hear in our media in the media phrases such as ‘race row’, ‘race relations’, ‘racial discrimination’, and ‘racially aggravated’. Muhammad (PBUH) clearly promoted the racial equality in 623 AD by choosing Bilal ibn Rabah, a black emancipated slave as Muazan (caller to prayer) of Islam. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) did not voice or campaign the cause of any specific race or ethnicity, but stood up for the whole humanity irrespective of caste, creed, race, color, language or geographical barriers. The divine Message he preached was universal, transgressing all obstacles whether artificial or otherwise.

    Sirs….. This year our Parliament along with the nation, will be celebrating 2015 as a special year: 800 years since the sealing of Magna Carta Charter. I want to bring it to your attention that Muhammad (PBUH) on 6th March 632 delivered a sermon (Khutba Hajatul Wada) which could be narrated as first declaration of Human Rights. In the sermon Prophet Muhammad clearly stated that all human beings are equal, racial supremacy is unacceptable, women have rights, socio-economic inequality is contemptible and should be confronted.

    It is very unfortunate that Muhammad’s religion, Muhammad’s theology, Muhammad’s message is being misrepresented and misinterpreted today by few groups. The rise of the barbaric terrorists of ISIS in Iraq and Syria is a stigma on the name of Islam. I fully agree with what Right Honourable Lord Nazir Ahmed has just said before me that ISIS is neither Islamic nor a state. The maniac has already killed thousands of Muslims as it considers other Muslims who do not follow their interpretation —Sunnis, Shias, Sufis, and similar groups within Islam—to be non-Muslims and therefore enemies. Throughout the recent months the captured fighters – and non-combatants – were shot or decapitated by ISIS, their deaths recorded in grisly videos which inspire fear and revulsion among opponents. The ISIS has clearly ignored the saying of Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H.) which suggests “The Believers, in their mutual love, mercy and compassion, are like one body: if one organ complained, the rest of the body develops a fever.” In light of core Islamic texts, the act of inciting terror in the hearts of defenceless civilians, the destruction of building and properties, the bombing and defacement of innocent men, women, and children, are all forbidden and are culpable, hateful acts according to Islam. I want to reiterate what Right Honourable MP, George Galloway has said in his speech that one should not jump to demonise Islam due to these despotic acts of ISIS.

    Muhammad (PBUH) whom we are discussing in this august house today was such a glittering example of mercy, patience, forbearance that when the people of Tai’f rejected him, stoned him, evicted him, and made him to bleed, he prayed for them…..he also prayed for the health and well-being of the ill women who use to through trash on him daily ……at the conquest of Macca he declared the house of his enemies as the place of general asylum for the public. Therefore, the vast majorities of Muslims follow the footsteps of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and a religion of peace, mercy, and forgiveness, and have nothing to do with the violent events that have become associated with some Muslims.

    It is also unfortunate that limitless freedom of speech in some of our neighbouring countries has hurt the Muslim religious sentiments across the world by publishing the obscene and racially aggravated cartoons of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). However, it is indeed a matter of great satisfaction that Britain unlike its neighbouring country has a very strong legislation in place to prevent the ‘obscenity’ and ‘racism’ in media. On this occasion….I would like to request the Muslim faith leaders to engage with the Muslim Youth to prevent them from engaging in extremist activities ……community leaders should stop exploring the ‘business opportunities’ in unfortunate happenings. It is about time that majority of peace loving main stream Muslims should come forward to confront the handful of extremists who misrepresent our faith.

    Sirs……. It was from the land of Charlie Hebdo that in 1854, famous French author, poet and Politician, Alphonse Marie Lamartine, wrote about Muhammad (PBUH) in his well-known Histoire de la Turquie: “if greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astounding results are the three criteria of human genius, who could dare to compare any great man in modern history with Muhammad? Of all standards by which human greatness can be measured, we may well ask … is there any man greater than Mohammed?”

    I would like to conclude with the words of our great fellow country man and co-founder of the London School of Economics, George Bernard Shaw, who wrote in 1936 : “He (Muhammad) must be called the Saviour of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the sovereignty of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it much needed peace and happiness”.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

    • Keil August 30, 2015 at

      Iftikhar Ahmed, you are notably aware not to present yourself as a moron inbreed. Due to Mr. Sennels’ article you give an overly long excerpt of a phony speech. You are eager to present yourself as an educated, but your lengthy bullshit don’t impress anybody. And your Mohammad (Piss Be Upon Him) you can put somewhere the sun is not shining.

  8. Keil August 30, 2015 at

    Our culture’s preference to equal all differences in life to “socially constructs” are by this and numerous other articles about this issue at this moment nullified. Another Danish psychologist, Helmuth Nyborg shows how IQ’s are lowered in the Arab Middle East and Africa. Nyborg sustains from a more elaborated explanation of the phenomenon.

  9. Cassie Herringdine September 29, 2015 at

    Remember the Bible story of Sodom and Gomorrah? Abraham’s uncle, Lott and his family were living in the sinful city when God chose to destroy it. Abraham begged God to spare his uncle along with all his house, so God sent an angel to warn Lott to leave the city and to never look back. Lott’s wife looked back as they fled and became a pillar of salt. Lott and his daughters hid in a cave. That night Lott’s daughters made their father drink wine, and they had incestuous sex with him to “preserve his seed”…many believe that as Abraham was the father of the Jewish people, so Lott was the father of the Persian/Arabic peoples. Incest has been a part of Islam since it began.

Leave a comment

Search

Back to Top