Socalled “replacement migration” is UNs solution for aging populations in the West. The aim is to keep up the amount of working age population – to ensure our level of production and competitevness. The UN is not interested in our indeginous culture and values, only the financial situation: money. No wonder why big banks like Goldman-Sachs supports UN’s plan. And as you might know, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – consisting of the world’s 57 Islamic – is the biggest bloc in the UN. The OIC thus have emmense influence in the UN. And OIC is also not interested in ensuring our Western culture and values…
Via UN.org (introduction to the report):
Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations? …
United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.
Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union).“
Excerpts from the report, via UN.org:
“The United Nations Population Division monitors fertility, mortality and migration trends for all countries of the world, as a basis for producing the official United Nations population estimates and projections. Among the demographic trends revealed by those figures, two are particularly salient: population decline and population ageing. Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the present study addresses the question of whether replacement migration is a solution to declining and ageing populations.
Although fertility may rebound in the coming decades, few believe that fertility in most developed countries will recover sufficiently to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future, thus making population decline inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. …
Building upon these estimates and projections, the present study considers six different scenarios with regard to the international migration streams needed to achieve specific population objectives….
The new challenges being brought about by declining and ageing populations will require objective, thorough and comprehensive reassessments of many established economic, social and political policies and programmes. Such reassessments will need to incorporate a long-term perspective. Critical issues to be addressed in those reassessments include … policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular replacement migration, and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.”
According to this graph from the report, Germany need 6,000 migrants per year per million inhabitants. Germany has 80,000,000 – so they need (according to UN) 480,000 migrants yearly. That is a high number, but including refugees, migrants and family reunifications, this is possible – and probably already happening. The problem is, that the new arrivals do not work, and they are to a high degree in opposition to our way of life: