UN’s scary plan for Europe: “Replacement Migration”

UN’s scary plan for Europe: “Replacement Migration”

10News 9 Comments on UN’s scary plan for Europe: “Replacement Migration”

Socalled “replacement migration” is UNs solution for aging populations in the West. The aim is to keep up the amount of working age population – to ensure our level of production and competitevness. The UN is not interested in our indeginous culture and values, only the financial situation: money. No wonder why big banks like Goldman-Sachs supports UN’s plan. And as you might know, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – consisting of the world’s 57 Islamic – is the biggest bloc in the UN. The OIC thus have emmense influence in the UN. And OIC is also not interested in ensuring our Western culture and values…

Related: UN chief of migration: EU must destroy homogeneity of member states through immigration

Via UN.org (introduction to the report):

“Replacement Migration:
Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations? …

United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.

Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union).

Excerpts from the report, via UN.org:

“The United Nations Population Division monitors fertility, mortality and migration trends for all countries of the world, as a basis for producing the official United Nations population estimates and projections. Among the demographic trends revealed by those figures, two are particularly salient: population decline and population ageing. Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the present study addresses the question of whether replacement migration is a solution to declining and ageing populations.

Although fertility may rebound in the coming decades, few believe that fertility in most developed countries will recover sufficiently to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future, thus making population decline inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. …

Building upon these estimates and projections, the present study considers six different scenarios with regard to the international migration streams needed to achieve specific population objectives….

The new challenges being brought about by declining and ageing populations will require objective, thorough and comprehensive reassessments of many established economic, social and political policies and programmes. Such reassessments will need to incorporate a long-term perspective. Critical issues to be addressed in those reassessments include … policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular replacement migration, and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.”

According to this graph from the report, Germany need 6,000 migrants per year per million inhabitants. Germany has 80,000,000 – so they need (according to UN) 480,000 migrants yearly. That is a high number, but including refugees, migrants and family reunifications, this is possible – and probably already happening. The problem is, that the new arrivals do not work, and they are to a high degree in opposition to our way of life:

ReplacementMigrationGraph

Share this:

Related Articles

9 Comments

  1. Shaniqua mohamed December 22, 2015 at

    This will help us take over eurabia

    • AC AP December 23, 2015 at

      You’ll be expelled and/or eliminated when the globalists have no use for you anymore. When their totalitarian regime comes into fruition you will be banished. The globalists’ plan is decades in the making. Islam is but a tool that will be cast aside once it isn’t needed anymore.

  2. coral December 23, 2015 at

    Why are non-Muslims excluded ? Over 90% of the immigrants are chosen to be Muslims – why the discrimination ? There are highly educated and trained professionals and technicians or skilled workers from the far east who can be easily integrated. They do not come with destruction and violence in mind yet The EU only wants to import dangerous unskilled trouble-makers from Africa, the Middle East and Indian Sub-continent. Why this self-destructive Agenda ?

  3. Keil December 26, 2015 at

    The faceless bureaucrats of the European Union have for a long time run twin-cycle with OIC. It’s a dangerous course to Europe. They don’t care the objectives are on a different level. Social engineering has to fulfill their efforts to maintain a socialist welfare state. That goal could be achieved with more skilled manpower from non-Moslem countries in Asia. But the stealth agreements with OIC is binding in one way or another.

  4. moneekwa December 26, 2015 at

    The problem is that for the plan to succeed, you would need replacement WORKERS, not welfare leeches who get whiney and riot when the hand-outs aren’t big enough.

    The tax base is still going to age because all these refugee-hadis are there for is to soak off benefits, and in some cases, perpetrate terror.

  5. Keith December 26, 2015 at

    How about governments and NGO’s expecting western women to have enough babies to replace the population?
    Maybe that would be racist against all those muslim immigrants who want to destroy everything that the UK, US, Canada, Australia, and Europe stand for.

  6. Joycey December 27, 2015 at

    Let’s take Japan…a country with 160+ million people and the 3rd largest world economy…They accepted 11, yes ELEVEN asylum seekers in total for the whole of 2014, citing that they must take care of their own citizens first!!!!

    Links:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-immigration-idUSKBN0M70JN20150311

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/refugee-crisis-after-accepting-11-asylum-seekers-in-2014-japan-could-restrict-system-even-more-10493130.html

  7. Theo February 16, 2016 at

    Please help to spread this knowledge on sustainability. Summary: Europe is 5x too full to be sustainable. We must stop immigration and send all immigrants back. Europeans should not be punished for their efforts to shrink as a population, but left alone to live the good example!

    For decades the European governors and scientists have told the European inhabitants that a growing population is bad. That it is against sustainability. That the environment will suffer… And they were right!

    This has not changed. At present the population of Europe is still FIVE TIMES TOO LARGE, as compared to a healthy sustainable population with the same level of development (calculated on the basis of #carbonfootprint). Therefore, even if the population of Europe would decrease from now on by one or a few percent per year, it will take many years for the European population to become one fifth of what it is now. This would not be bad at all, but a healthy shrinking towards ecologically sustainable population levels.

    However, what are the EU bureaucrats doing, instead of congratulating Europe that finally it is able to slowly DEcrease its population? They PUNISH the Europeans by immediately importing immigrants on a large scale.

    Useful immigrants? No, the worst immigrants of all, badly educated lower class people from islamic countries. Many of them who will not work, who have an anti-western-culture and who will give the same troubles we already have seen with exactly this same type of immigrants. It is a shame. We do not need immigrants. A slowly shrinking population is good. The European people should stand up and resist this terrible, irreversible and self-destructive development.

    Immigration is not going to help Europe, and it is certainly not going to help the world. All populations should find out by themselves their own ways to shrink, instead of being allowed to send their growth surplusses elsewhere, and not being punished for growing too fast. The world is too full for that now. In the future, SPACE will be the most valuable asset. We should not give any space away to immigrants, as we have far too little for ourselves: one fifth of what we really need!

Leave a comment

Search

Back to Top