Danish professor : Jihadis are just following the example of Mohammed

(Photo above: Tina Magaard)

For three years a Danish linguist Tina Magaard analyzed the basic texts of 10 religions. Her conclusion is that the texts of Islam stand out by encouraging terrorism and violence more than other religions.

Now Tina Magaard speaks out again. Translated from Berlingske:

Tina Magaard has great knowledge about Islam, both personally and academically. She believes that Danish experts in Islam fail to disclose what is in Islam’s holy scriptures, and the extent to which extremism draws its ammunition from these scriptures. …

She studied Arabic and read both the Qur’an and the hadiths. Here she recognized many of the repressive tendencies, she had experienced [on her travels in Muslim countries].

“What is striking is not in itself that one can find murderous passages in the Islamic texts, as such passages can also be found in other religions. But it is striking how much space these passages takes up in the Islamic texts and how much they focus on a them-and-us-logic where infidels and apostates are characterized as dirty, rotten, criminal, hypocritical and dangerous. It it also striking how much these texts demands the reader to fight the infidels, both with the words and the sword. In many passages Mohammed plays a central role as one who encourages the use of violence, whether it comes to stonings, beheadings, acts of war or execution of critics and poets.”

Tina Magaard finds it particularly objectionable that so many Islamic scholars in her opinion knowingly fails to disclose this fact and use their position of power to create specific standards for what you can say. Often, they also blame Danish racism rather than objectively telling that the justifications for using violence and threats, extremists actually find in Islam’s holy scriptures. …

Asked whether it after KrudttA?nden (terror attack in Copenhagen, February 2015) and the attack on Charlie Hebdo is desirable for future harmony and coexistence to stop drawing Muhammed, Tina Magaards answers unequivocally:

“The only thing we get out of saying that we must not draw Mohammed, is that there will be more religiously motivated restrictions on our freedoms. Rather, we must take the bull by the horns and question whether Muhammad did the right thing when he, for example, ordered his critics murdered. The discussion we need to take with European Muslims.”

The most thought provocing things is, according to Tina Magaard that it is so difficult to find an imam who dare or want to criticize the aspects of Islam which contrast liberal freedoms

“Instead you get a chitchat like: ‘It is not relevant to discuss in Denmark now’ or ‘this is a misunderstanding.’ But they refuse to criticise the concrete passages which terrorists use to justify their actions,” Magaard says.

Share this:


  1. It isn’t only Danish experts in Islam who fail to disclose what is in Islam’s holy scriptures.

    Three commonly-heard lies are that Islam is a religion of peace, that [insert latest Islamic atrocity] has nothing to do with Islam and that Islamic terrorists are extremists who are following a distorted version of the religion. They are lies told by many Muslims to advance Islam and mislead non-Muslims into believing that Islam is benign.

    The same lies are told by western politicians, the media, royalty and other traitors who won’t protect their people against Islam and tell them what Islam’s instructions to Muslims really are.

    There is only one Islam and that is the Islam of the Koran and the Hadiths. They make it clear that the only peace in Islam is the peace of the grave, that the latest Islamic atrocity is distinctly Islamic and that Islamic terrorists are not extremists but rather genuine Muslims following the letter and spirit of Islam.

    Islam cannot be sanitised, it is innately evil and the West desperately needs to be purged.

    One solution is to tell the truth about Islam’s instructions to Muslims, to outlaw Islam, to stop letting Muslims in, to deport all Muslims to Islamic countries and deport the traitors with them.

    An alternative solution is to continue lying about Islam and wait for a civil war to be triggered by someone taking the law into their own hands because the legal system won’t protect them after a family member is attacked by Muslims.

  2. Would you wear a T-shirt with a Mohammad cartoon printed on it?

    You might in Montana. Don’t try it in Mecca.


    Because, Islam trains a small number of its most devout believers it’s OK to kill. And Islamic killers have been trained to kill anyone who insults Allah and/or Mohammad.

    In Montana you’d have a good chance none of these Islamic killers would see you.

    In Mecca you wouldn’t last five minutes. One of Islam’s killers would come from out of nowhere and kill you. It is that simple.

    You don’t believe me? Ask any Muslim!

    Read how fear hold Islam together at:http://islamsfatalflaw.blogspot.com/

  3. It should not take THREE YEARS to read and understand Islam’s aim-
    nothing less than World domination by force, following Madmanmohammad’s
    example. “LO, I have been made victorious through TERROR”

    (Quran 8:67) “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.'”

    • I’ve got the Pickthall Koran and the Maulana Muhammad Ali Koran (whitewash Islam version) with commentary. I’ll read Ali to get the whitewashed version then Pickthall to see what they’re really saying. Ever notice that when people talk to Muslims about their “religion of peace” they always, without exception, resort to lying, denying and whitewashing?

      I’ve started wading through the full version of the Peel Commission Report. You want an idea of what it’s like to deal with Muslims read the first part of that. You want to know how Muslims consistently think of Jews?

      The 4th Conference of the Academy of Islamic Research: Arab Theologians on Jews and Israel. Sept. 1968 Translated by D.F. Green/David G. Littman (Support Secure Freedom)

      Supplemental Article “The First and Last Enemy: Jew Hatred in Islam.” by Bostom (Frontpage Magazine archive)

      Subscribe to Jihad/Campus Watch and the Middle East Forum/Quarterly, Family Security Matters, Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Gatestone Institute, FrontPage Magazine, American Thinker, The Clarion Project, Cross Muslims, Palestinian Media Watch, Muhammad unveiled, Religion of Peace and read Raymond Ibrahim, Andrew Harrod, Efraim Karsh, Frank Gaffney, Patrick Poole, Caroline Glick, Bat Ye’or and others.

  4. This is why conversion to Islam ought to be made a serious criminal offence of blasphemy, as should wildully continuing to profess Islam after being asked by a police officer to stop.

  5. May God keep His Daughter, Tina safe from the cult of Death,i.e. islam(submission)…Only our True God of Moses/Jesus can SAVE the lost….

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Deense professor: Jihadisten volgen gewoon het voorbeeld van Mohammed | E.J. Bron

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.