Democracy in the UK: Muslim voters can decide 25 percent of seats

Muslim votes has already put pro-multiculture, pro-EU leaders in charge of France and Denmark. They in turn will make sure that Europe imports even more Muslims, and at one point we will only have Leftists leaders – until the Muslim voters are enough to put co-religionists as leaders of our countries. Until then, Muslim politicians will have to dress as sheeps or simply cheat.

Via Daily Mail:

“British Muslims could have the decisive vote in a quarter of constituencies, analysis shows.

In 159 of the 632 seats, the number of Muslims is greater than the margin of victory in 2010.

And this is true among almost half the 193 marginal seats, according to the Henry Jackson Society, which has carried out the first study of the religious breakdown of each seat.

There are also 51 constituencies where the number of Hindus is larger than the winning majority five years ago.

In addition, there are 15 constituencies, all marginal, where the number of Buddhists is greater than the margin of victory and 13 constituencies where the number of Jewish voters is greater.

The HJS, a think-tank, said that, as a result, Britain’s minority religions have the potential to exert a huge influence on the election result.

Executive director Alan Mendoza said: ‘You can suddenly see the changing patterns in terms of religious minority, majority and non-affiliation, and how that plays out on the political landscape.”

Share this:




4 Comments

  1. Muslims in the West are not asking for Sharia to be the law of the land. The Law of the land is the only law applicable and executable in affairs of the individuals.

    All they are seeking is to let Sharia be available as an alternative to resolve their spousal and contractual disputes between two individuals. That is their prerogative. Indeed, every human, no matter who it is, goes first to their family members and friends for seeking solutions to their problem some will go to their clergy (all religions) and some will appoint a mediator.

    When Muslims go to their clergy, he or she will look up similar situations in the past and guide the couple or business partners to find a solution, since the immigrant Muslims are familiar with the Sharia laws, they may accept it, and if they do, that is good for them.

    The problem is that of trust – when the parties agree to the terms per their Imam/clergy, and don’t abide by it, there is no way the aggrieved party can seek damages for the violations. This is what Muslims are asking, to make that binding.

    Indeed, it would be binding if they go to the judge and say, we have agreed to these terms and conditions per our religious conviction, and seek the judge to sign the order and the court order becomes executable. The judge looks to it as mediator resolved decision and signs it and it will become executable. The right wing Americans are downright stupid and making a bid deal about this, as if Sharia will become the law of the land.

    What Muslims have is Personal Sharia, that is a private relationship between the individual and God. How they pray, worship, fast, pay zakat, how they bury their individuals, marry per the requirement as a religious rite. All of that is a private matter and does not need any regulation or execution.
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*