Hungary’s PM: “Mass migration threatens European civilisation”

(Photo above: Viktor Orban, democratically elected PM of Hungary (left), and the real dictator,A�Jean-Claude Juncker (right), appointed bureaucrat and chairman of the EU Commission)

As this brilliant, short video from the French Identitaire movement points out, being wealthy enough to live in safe distance from violent, Muslim ghettos is becoming a privilege in Western European towns and cities.

The chairman of theA�EU Commission Jean-Claude Juncker pointed to the Hungarian PM, Viktor Orban, and noted “the dictator is coming“. Ironically, Orban is the only democratically elected of the two. Due to EUs suicidal refugee campaing, where mainly Muslims just needs to sail a few miles into the Mediterranean Sea before EUs taxpayer funded boats come and pick them up and transport them directly into the open Schengen area, EU is virtually open to all of Africa and the Middle East. And if you do not have the above mentioned privilege you might think that Europe – at least the part where you are forced to live in out of economic or other reasons – has already changed to the unrecognizable.

When it comes to Muslim mass immigration, Orban is absolutely right and his warning should be translated and spread everywhere.

Via Telegraph:

Related:
a�?A�2.5 million refugees on their way to EU via Turkey alone
a�?A�Refugees allowed into Italy after threat to drown babies
a�?A�EU transports more than 5,000 Mediterranean Migrants to Europe during a weekend
a�?A�Scandal: EU authorities conspiring with North African human smugglers

“Mass migration threatens European civilisation, Hungary’s controversial Prime Minister Viktor Orban said Tuesday.

Today mass migration is taking place around the globe that could change the face of Europe’s civilisation. If that happens, that is irreversible,” Mr Orban said at a conference in honour of former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, who recently turned 85.

“There is no way back from a multicultural Europe. Neither to a Christian Europe, nor to the world of national cultures,” Mr Orban added.

He insisted that migration needs to be addressed seriously.

“If we make a mistake now, it will be forever,” Mr Orban, 52, said.”

Share this:




5 Comments

  1. Why complain when it’s the British who first migrated into other lands enslaving those people? When it is a question on immigration, the feelings are so strong. I wonder why. Serves you right! Britain! When the British colonised the world, it was ok. But now when people from the former colonies and from other countries come to Britain, its not ok? Look into history and then you can cry because what goes around comes around. Don’t see why people have such a problem with mass immigration? It enriches our culture and boosts the economy! We have to stop looking at these people as immigrants and think of them as human beings. The immigrants are not to blame because they were invited and welcomed here by our successive government. We have quite large Spanish , French and Italian communities in Brighton and I believe it really enhances the place and adds to diversity of the City. Globalisation is here to stay. Britain colonised & some would say civilised half the world. It’s called Karma. Not so long ago British people colonized Asia, living like kings while locals suffering to no end. At least, these migrants do not enslave the Britons, so stop whining please.

    Multiculturalism has always been defined and implemented wrongly by the British establishment. Multiculturalism involves a level of complexity which cannot be understood from the prospective of any single discipline. Instead, historical, cultural, linguistic, political, economic, educational, sociological and psychological factors and processes all play a critical role. Multiculturalism is not about integration but about cultural plurality. It is not about separation but about respect and the deepening awareness of Unity in Diversity. Each culture will maintain its own intrinsic value and at the same time would be expected to contribute to the benefit of the whole society. Multiculturalism can accommodate diversity of all kinds – cultural, philosophical and religious, so that we can create a world without conflict and strife. Britain can assume the role of accommodation and concern for all peoples, for our planet and indeed for our survival. We live in a rapidly changing world. British Muslims are ordinary people with the same sorts of ambitions, frustrations, failures and successes as anybody else. We are just like you, go to work, pay taxes, obey the law and just want to get on with our everyday life. We are hated simply for following Islam.

    According to labour’s Karen Buck, Muslims in Britain are now at the sharper end of race hatred and xenophobia. West has many stereotypes, misconceptions about Islam that are due to the media, prejudice and ignorance. Islam is often looked upon as an extremist, terrorist religion. To fight malaria, one does not shoot down mosquitoes, one drains the swamps. Urgent government action is needed to tackle Islamophobia and “institutional disadvantages” suffered by British Muslim community. Now it has become widely accepted that, in Bernard Lewis’ words, “Europe will be Islamic by the end of the century”. The greater Islamist threat to the West is not violence-flattening buildings, bombing railroad stations and night clubs, seizing theatres and schools – but the peaceful, legal growth of power through education, the law, the media and the political system.”
    IA
    http://www.londonschoolofislamics.org.uk

  2. The argument above is so riddled with holes that it looks like a broken sieve. It would be disgusting if no one else in Europe knows how to counter this mass of illogical poop. It also shows up the abysmal intellectual calibre and educational backwardness of this so-called londonschoolofislamics (sic) character.

    To begin with do Europeans today really understand and appreciate their history of democratization ? The concepts of human freedom may have been laid down by just a handful of Greek and Roman scholars but the realization and implementation of those principles took a few thousand years to reach the refined state that Europe was in the 60’s and 70’s. After such a long gestation, it still wasn’t perfect no doubt, but it was getting close.

    That period of distillation ( both concepts and legal structure ) involved countless wars, rebellions and massacres in both Europe and North America based on the opposition to systems based on tyranny and feudalism. The marginalisation of natives was indeed the failure to uphold these same principles on account of uncontrolled greed in the occupying population but it should be appreciated that there were elements of society that supported respect for the weaker groups.
    Furthermore these people who fought for native rights were not suppressed by absolutist laws to forbid their actions – because they were still encompassed under the ambit of human freedom.

    Now compare this to the development of so-called Islamic ‘civilization’ – there is nothing civil in a system that institutionalizes ancient tribal laws for the sole purpose of autocratic control and suppression. It is roughly equivalent to the feudal systems of ancient European communities with their typical servitude of the under-privileged, unbridled slavery, marginalization of women, wholesale exploitation of peripheral populations etc. To be cynical perhaps this situation is exactly what western governments INTEND to revert to, looking at their wholesale support for Sharia laws against the wishes of concerned citizens.

    Therein lies the rub – have the citizens of the west now become so uneducated, uninformed and complacent or disillusioned that they generally do not know or care about their own eventual destruction ? Do they not realize that Myanmar, Sri Lanka, India, China and Russia are actually fighting for long-term survival when the agenda-filled western and OIC-influenced governments condemn these few countries for their anti-Islamic policies ?

  3. Thank you Coral for the excellent comment.

    This iftikar is a perfectly first rate muslim taqiyya and silvertong combination.
    Hey iftikar! why don’t you change your fellow musulman hordes so they can fit in somehow??

  4. From the umdat salique (the reliance of the traveller) sharia law approved by all sunni schools
    firstly – what is it ?
    It is a classical manual of Shafi’i fiqh, meaning it is an authoritative summation of the Islamic jurisprudence– also known as Shari’a– associated with the Sunni Shafi’i school. al Misri based the Umdat al-Salik on the previous Shafi’i works of Nawawi and Abu Ishaq as-Shirazi.

    and when is a mohammedan permitted to lie (of course following mohammed’s example)
    section r8.2
    Speaking is a means to achieve objectives
    If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying,it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it..When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth,it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible

    Whether the purpose is war,settling a disagreement or gaining the sympathy of a victim legally entitled to retaliate against one so that he will forbear to do so:: it is not unlawfulto lie when any of these aims can only be obtained through lying

Leave a Reply to kodiac Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*