Secret report: Muslim police officers in UK more corrupt

(Image above: Map showing corruption in countries. From Transparency International, who concludes that “Muslim-majority Countries Among the Most Corrupt on Earth”)

Logic: If you invite people from highly corrupt countries – which on top is dominated by a religion that tells people to cheat and abuse people from your country – to become police officers in our own country, you might get a more corrupt, abusive police force.

From The Guardian:

A secret high-level Metropolitan police report has concluded that Muslim officers are more likely to become corrupt than white officers because of their cultural and family backgrounds.

The document, which has been seen by the Guardian, has caused outrage among ethnic minorities within the force, who have labelled it racist and proof that there is a gulf in understanding between the police force and the wider Muslim community. The document was written as an attempt to investigate why complaints of misconduct and corruption against Asian officers are 10 times higher than against their white colleagues.

The main conclusions of the study, commissioned by the Directorate of Professional Standards and written by an Asian detective chief inspector, stated: “Asian officers and in particular Pakistani Muslim officers are under greater pressure from the family, the extended family … and their community against that of their white colleagues to engage in activity that might lead to misconduct or criminality.”

It recommended that Asian officers needed special anti-corruption training and is now being considered by a working party of senior staff.

Share this:




2 Comments

  1. Not “Asian” (although the Guardian dare not mention that most of the corrupt officers are Muslim and would rather libel all Asians) but Muslim. Please let us name things for what they are!

    • Defining “their fellow officers” as WHITE is RACIST. They are non-muslim, NOT white; many would be Indian, West Indian and others of non-white origin.

      Just another use of misleading language by a so-called ‘journalist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*